IAPMR Community Links

IAPMR has a great community. Click on the link to visit…

IAPMR on Facebook

We feature the latest five posts below (and there is a ‘more’ button too). Members can give permission (a requirement of Facebook) for their name and avatar to appear with their posts. Please follow these instructions…

Support and Partnerships

Public Media Researchers is supported by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)

https://ebu.ch/

We work in partnership with the Public Media Alliance (PMA) and the Center for Media Data and Society (CMDS) at the Central European University (CEU)

RIPE/IAPMR Newsletter 3/2020

RIPE/IAPMR Newsletter 2/2020

Soft Power, Hard News: How Journalists at State-Funded Transnational Media Legitimize Their Work

Kate Wright, Martin Scott, Mel Bunce | Sage Journals
Published: May 2020

How do journalists working for different state-funded international news organizations legitimize their relationship to the governments which support them? In what circumstances might such journalists resist the diplomatic strategies of their funding states?

We address these questions through a comparative study of journalists working for international news organizations funded by the Chinese, US, UK and Qatari governments. Using 52 interviews with journalists covering humanitarian issues, we explain how they minimized tensions between their diplomatic

role and dominant norms of journalistic autonomy by drawing on three – broadly shared – legitimizing narratives, involving different kinds of boundary-work. In the first ‘exclusionary’ narrative, journalists differentiated their ‘truthful’ news reporting from the ‘false’ state ‘propaganda’ of a common Other, the Russian-funded network, RT. In the second ‘fuzzifying’ narrative, journalists deployed the ambiguous notion of ‘soft power’ as an ambivalent ‘boundary concept’, to defuse conflicts between journalistic and diplomatic agendas. In the final ‘inversion’ narrative, journalists argued that, paradoxically, their dependence on funding states gave them greater ‘operational autonomy’. Even when journalists did resist their funding states, this was hidden or partial, and prompted less by journalists’ concerns about the political effects of their work, than by serious threats to their personal cultural capital.

Text sourced via SageRead report

Small Screen: Big Debate

Ofcom
2020

Join the conversation on the future of public service broadcasting in the UK

This website will allow you to access a wide variety of research, learn more of our work in this area and submit your views directly to us on the future of public service broadcasting and media.Explore website

Reporting facts: free from fear or favour

UNESCO | Marius Dragomir
Published: 2020

Preview of In Focus report on World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development

Explore preview

Countering Disinformation

Cardiff University | Arts and Humanities Research Council
2020

“Disinformation is a growing risk to the health of many democratic systems. Funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, this project will assess how leading UK public service media are counteracting it in news reporting.”

This project is the largest of its kind in the UK and focusses on the content produced by The BBC, Channel 4 ITV and Sky News. It aims to provide a “comprehensive understanding of how British public service media and audiences are

developing practices to address and counter disinformation. “Go to website

Journalism Thrives in Slovakia Despite Growing Oligarchic Control

Center for Media, Data and Society | Central European University
Published: May 2020

Slovaks have access to a plethora of news platforms, but many of them are in the hands of powerful financial corporations, closely linked with political groups. Nevertheless, swelling demand for accurate, quality information boosts the country’s independent journalism.

Slovakia is a voracious news consumer, with almost two thirds of people reading news portals, newspapers or news magazines. Much of this news appetite was stirred by technological advancement. Over 86% of people use the internet, which is a big leap

from less than 30% in the beginning of the 2010s…

Text sourced from CMDS | CEURead full report